Defendants are not guilty.

1. Defendant A is the representative director of Defendant Company B (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangseo-gu and D, who operates the Defendant Company, and the Defendant Company is a corporation established for the purpose of agricultural products distribution, trade, etc.

(a) The Minister for Food and Drug Safety in violation of the Food and Drug Sanitation Act may publicly notify the matters concerning labels of foods for sale in order to promote national health, and shall not sell, import, display, transport, or use for business purposes, unless they are indicated in compliance with the standards;

Imported food pursuant to the standards for labeling food, etc. (Public Notice No. 2016-31) publicly notified by the Minister of Food and Drug Safety shall be indicated in Korean, along with the name of the product, the type of food, the explanation of business, the location of the food, etc.

Nevertheless, on September 20, 2016, the Defendant sent one alter produced by the “E” company “E” company “E” company “E” company “E” company “E” company that does not indicate Korean language, and used products without the indication of Korean language for business purposes.

B. On September 24, 2016, the Defendant: (a) on the victim F and the telephone call, protested against the dispatch of the instant “E” product to the Defendant without having a Korean sign on September 24, 2016; and (b) on the part of the victim F and the Defendant: (c) on the part of the Defendant, the Defendant would have to talk that the Defendant is a person who opened the stop stop stop stop and stop stop stop stop, which would have been reported as an obstruction of business if he does not know the goods; and (d) on the part of

The phrase “intimidating the victim to be punished for a criminal offense or to make a speech or behavior that would prejudice the honor of the victim.”

B. The defendant company's defendant company Gap, the representative of the defendant, was on the defendant's business.

A. (i) A product without Korean translation as described in paragraph (1) was used for business.

2. Determination

A. The Defendants’ violation of the Food Sanitation Act.