Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for four months.

, however, the defendant from the date of this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants’ co-principal

A. At around 06:00 on March 2, 2015, the Defendants: (a) 112 reported that he did not pay the drinking value at the “Dju store” located in Pyeongtaek-si; (b) and (c) the Defendant expressed the desire to “Is the victim F, a police officer in the Pyeongtaek-gu Police Station E District of Pyeongtaek-gu, G, etc., who was called upon receipt of a 112 report, and demanded the identification card; and (d) the Defendant expressed the desire to “Is the son, a fluor, a fluor, a fluor, a fluor, a fluor, a fluor, a fluor, a fluor, a fluor,” and Defendant B expressed the desire to “Is the fluor, a fluor, a fluor, a fluor, a

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to insult the victim publicly.

B. Since the Defendants in the obstruction of performance of official duties proposed F to leave the scene without complying with the request of a policeman’s identification card at the date, time, and place specified in the above paragraph 1(a), Defendant A sealed the upper half of F with shoulder shoulder, and pushed down the chest with the upper half of F by hand, Defendant B was f with his hand, and Defendant B was f with a defect in order for F to arrest Defendant A as a flagrant offender.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the 112 reported case by police officers.

2. Defendant A, at the time and place indicated in the above paragraph 1(a) as the F demanded an identification card in order to verify his identity, the Defendant held an official document by presenting the H’s driver’s license in his meeting as if he were his driver’s license.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. Application of the police protocol of statement to F;

1. A defendant of the pertinent legal provision concerning criminal facts: Articles 311, 136 (1), 30, and 230 of the Criminal Act (or each choice of imprisonment): Articles 311, 136 (1), and 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act: