beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 3,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.
The Defendants respectively.
Reasons
Criminal facts
1. Defendants
A. On June 21, 2014, the Defendants violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint violence) committed in violation of the following: (a) on the ground that the victim E (year 25) and the victim F (year 26) from the next simple table table, while drinking B and drinking in front of the D convenience point located in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si; (b) 0:40 on June 21, 2014.
Defendant
A marks the hair of the victim E, and her chest of the victim F was able to take over three times.
Defendant
B, as a result, the victim E has reached the side of the victim E due to a long flive flock, which was taking the flick of the victim E.
Accordingly, the Defendants jointly assaulted victims.
(b) No person who violates the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act shall, while under the influence of alcohol, alcohol or slick by verbal or behavioral acts conducted by government offices;
Defendants were arrested in flagrant offenders under the suspicion of the above paragraph at the time and place mentioned in the above paragraph (a) and were transferred to the G District of Suwon Police Station.
The Defendants, while under the influence of alcohol, stated, “The flob flob flob flob flob chlob chlob flob flob chlob blob blob blob hlob blob
As a result, the Defendants were forced to the horses and actions conducted by government offices while under the influence of alcohol.
The prosecutor was prosecuted as a co-principal, but he was recognized as a single principal offense by the Defendants.
2. At the time and place mentioned in the above 1-B, Defendant A taken the form of the Defendant’s disturbance using a mobile phone camera in order to collect evidence of the Defendant’s crime of 1-B at the police station G District G District of Suwon High Police Station: (a) the Defendant taken the form of the Defendant’s disturbance using a mobile phone camera.
The defendant called "Yeak police sweak, sweaking, sweaking," and called "Yeak h's arms at the above h's hand floor."
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the collection of evidence by police officers.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ legal statement
1. E and H.