logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2019.05.24 2019고단776
특수상해등
Text

[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. A. Around 23:20 on October 19, 2018, the Defendant: (a) heard 5 entertainment tavern rooms in the Yannam-gun, Yannam-gun, in order to listen to the horses that he did not appear from the victim D (n, 38 years of age) who is an employee; (b) Macju in the face of the victim D; and (c) Macju, which is a dangerous object on the table of the table, has been placed in favor of the victim; and (d) continuously had the victim’s head from the beer’s disease, caused damage to the head part that requires approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim D, and caused damage to the head part that requires approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim.

B. On the grounds that the victim E (the age of 30) who heard and found D’s secret voice in the date, time, place, and location described in the above paragraph (a) opened a door and brought the proposal, the injured Defendant, depending on the victim, she called “Choe,” “Choe,” and her head was damaged by the victim’s body over five times, and she faced with the victim’s body head over five times, thereby causing about about two weeks, thereby causing about loss of the character of the head part in need of approximately two weeks.

C. On October 19, 2018, the Defendant: (a) expressed his desire to assault E at the place indicated in the foregoing paragraph (a) at around 23:35 on October 19, 2018; (b) 112 reported and sent to the 112 report, and used to assault E from G, etc., such as “this is close to the tax interval; and (c) she will throw off the same.” In light of the following circumstances, the Defendant committed assault, such as “I will throw away the same.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

2. Defendant B, on the ground that the test was used in the course of the arrest of Defendant B, at the time, place, and background G, as described in paragraph (3) of Article 1-1, on the floor of the G during which he arrested Defendant B, saying, “drawing our style would be an electric gun?” and the back of the background G during which he is arrested.

arrow