logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.04.21 2015고단167
위계공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 6, 2014, around 02:30 on October 6, 2014, the Defendant reported as follows: “Around 112-day mobile phone along the 112-day mobile phone to the 112-day reporting center, saying, “A vehicle is threatening to drive away the police station.” The Defendant sent it to the police station. I wish to kill and kill the police.”

However, at the time, the police cars continued to drive away from the defendant, and the defendant was in the course of driving about about 20 meters away from fire and fire.

around that time after receiving the above report, eight police officers, including F, and eight police officers assigned to the Seoul Southern Police Station Estation, called the scene to search for the defendant, etc.

Accordingly, the Defendant reported false facts in 112, and thereby, in light of the name of the offense in a deceptive scheme, applicable provisions of the indictment, and the content of the facts charged, the “act of force” in Articles 1 and 2 of the facts charged is apparent to be a clerical error

As a result, the receipt of 112 reports and the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the dispatch to the site was hindered.

2. At around 02:45 on the same day, the Defendant called the 112 reporting center from the former G Hamoel to the mobile phone at the 112 reporting center on the same day, and reported as “I am saves, I am saves, I am saves, I am saves, I am

However, there is no fact that the defendant was threatened by a police officer.

Around that time after receiving the above report, F, I, etc., a police officer, called the site and found the defendant at the site and was subject to search duties at the site.

Accordingly, the defendant reported false facts in 112 and interfered with the police officer's legitimate execution of duties on the receipt of 112 reports by fraudulent means and on the dispatch of the site.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Application of the police statement-related Acts and subordinate statutes to F;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 137 of the Criminal Act concerning the crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution;

arrow