Text
1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
(a) The current status of the I department store building 1) the former I department store located on the E, F, and G ground in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul (hereinafter “former Commercial Building”).
A) Around May 1970, the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, a part of the site of the previous commercial building in Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, which was a J redevelopment project in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, was partially passed, was divided into four parcels of land AH, K, AF, and G, and the said road was constructed on the ground of K among which the said land was installed. Around May 1, 1970, part of the previous commercial building was removed, and a part of the building of the building of this case was removed, and the 1st floor of the business of E, E, F, and G ground reinforced concrete slab branch, the 2nd floor 591.1 square meters, 592 square meters, 34.75 square meters, 416.75 square meters, and 343.59 square meters (hereinafter “new commercial building G building of this case
AF, AG Seoul Special Metropolitan City exchanged K land designated as a road as above with the land owned by it as above. The 2830.74 square meters on the ground, 2830.74 square meters on the 4th floor and the 1st floor of the 2nd floor, 2830.74 square meters on the 3th floor, 2830.74 square meters on the 4th floor, 298.18 square meters on the 298.18 square meters on the 4th floor, 2908.26 square meters on the 2nd underground floor, 1804.13 square meters on the 1804 square meters on the 2nd underground floor (hereinafter “instant new commercial E-Dong”), while combined with the said Gdong
2) The new commercial building of this case has several sectional ownership registrations, but each shop inside the building is not divided into bearing walls, etc.
A divided owner has divided a specific store, but the use of the above registry does not coincide with the room of the actual owner.
B. Status 1 of the parties is the father of the Plaintiffs (hereinafter “the deceased”).
Around December 27, 1966, the Plaintiff acquired ownership of No. 17, 25.52 square meters and 13.49 square meters in the previous commercial building of this case. Since a partial commercial building was removed due to the J redevelopment Project in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the register of the above building on June 8, 1989 (hereinafter “Plaintiffs’ registration parts”).
was bound as a whole.
The plaintiffs are from the deceased on March 21, 1995.