beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. The Defendants’ real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 and 2;
B. Defendant C and E shall be as specified in attached Table 3, 3.
Reasons
Basic Facts
The Plaintiff is a housing redevelopment project partnership that completed the registration of incorporation on July 26, 201 after obtaining authorization for the establishment from the Ansan market on July 25, 201, in order to implement a A district housing redevelopment project (hereinafter “instant project”) that has implemented the A district housing redevelopment project that has implemented the A district housing redevelopment project in Ansan-si as a project implementation district (hereinafter “instant project”).
Defendant B, C, and D are owners of shares of each real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1, 2, 17, 20, and 21 in the project implementation district of this case (the ownership of shares owned by Defendant B is currently accepted and owned by the Plaintiff), the Defendants jointly own each real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1, 2, 17, 20, and 21; Defendant C, C, and D jointly own each real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 3, 3, 4; Defendant C, C, and D jointly own each real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 6, 13, 14, and 15, 16 of the separate sheet; Defendant C, C, and D jointly own each real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 15, 17, 18, 19, 19, 2, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20
(hereinafter collectively referred to as “each of the instant real estate” in the attached list). The Ansan market approved and publicly announced the Plaintiff’s project implementation plan on May 27, 2015, and approved and publicly announced the Plaintiff’s management and disposal plan on November 25, 2016.
(hereinafter “instant management and disposition plan”). The Plaintiff received an application for parcelling-out from October 6, 2015 to November 10, 2015 (which shall be extended to November 20, 2015), and Defendant C and D respectively filed an application for parcelling-out on November 9, 2015 and October 7, 2015 during the said period.
The plaintiff did not consult with the defendant B, who is a person subject to cash settlement of the business of this case.