1. The defendant Global Construction, E, and F are listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 through 5, respectively, to the plaintiff C.

1. The building of the 2nd underground and the 8th above ground located in I in Chuncheon City of the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant building”) was newly constructed on August 28, 2013 by a contract with the Defendant Global Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Global Construction”), and on August 28, 2013, Plaintiff C purchased the pertinent building from 301, 302, 303, 801, 803 (Attached List 1 through 5), and Plaintiff B completed the registration of ownership transfer among the above buildings (Attached List 1,11, 501, 503, 504, 505, 601, 602, 603, 601, 602, 603 (Attached List 6 through 14), and Plaintiff A purchased the pertinent building from 205, 604, 205, 201 to 207, 2017, 207

(Attachment List hereinafter referred to as "each of the stores of this case"). [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap's entries in subparagraphs 1 through 4 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Determination as to the claim against the Defendant NAN General Construction, E, and F

A. Determination as to the claim for extradition 1) The facts in possession of each of the instant stores do not conflict between the parties, or can be recognized by comprehensively taking into account the overall purport of the pleadings in the video of the evidence No. 5. Thus, the above Defendants, barring special circumstances, are obligated to deliver each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 through (5) to the Plaintiff, the owner of each of the instant stores, the real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 6 through 14, the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 15 through 21 to the Plaintiff, and the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 22 and 23 to the Plaintiff, and the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 15 through 21 to the Plaintiff to the Plaintiff, and Defendant E and F to the Plaintiff as the lien holder for the instant building including each of the instant stores. Specifically, Defendant E and F claimed the construction price claim against the Defendant WD Co., Ltd.