A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, as the representative director of P Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “P”), who operates the OF Research Institute, owned Q Q Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “P”), along with Defendant-friendly R, who owns a construction work, and real estate implementation business. In order to repay Q Q’s 6.19 billion won of a PF loan to a new bank in Q Q’s name, received another loan from a new bank in Q Q Q’s name in order to repay Q’s 6.19 billion won, and instead, received another loan from a new bank in Qu’s name, the Defendant’s husband, who is not related to Q Q, arbitrarily provided a new bank deposit in Qu’s name to the

1. On December 22, 2008, the Defendant, without authority, voluntarily stated “S” in the column for establishing a pledge of a new bank related to S’s bank V and W deposit account without authority for the purpose of exercising at the office of the Defendant at the office of the Defendant, Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government U.S., and affixed S’s seal on his name and affixed a copy of a pledge of a private document related to S’s rights and obligations under S’s name. On the same day, the Defendant, at the Seocho-gu Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho Bank, submitted to X the same amount that the said contract was duly concluded, and exercised it.

2. On December 26, 2008, for the purpose of exercising authority at the office of the above defendant, the defendant, without authority, had a non-public official enter T’s Y account-related contract form into “T” arbitrarily in the column for establishing a pledge right in the form of T’s new bank Y account, affixing his seal on T’s name and forged one copy of the contract form for establishing a pledge right in the name of T’s name, which is a private document on the rights and obligations of T’s name. On the same day, at the Seocho-Namnam Financial Center of the above new bank, the defendant submitted to X the same amount that the contract was duly formed.

3. On April 20, 2009, the Defendant is related to the S bank W and Z account without authority for the purpose of exercising at the office of the above Defendant.