A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On January 2, 2017, the Defendant reported that the Defendant would not pay taxi charges in front of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul around 18:20, and that the Defendant would not pay taxi charges on the roads under the influence of alcohol on the roads of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul around January 2, 2017, Seoul, upon receipt of a request for payment of taxi charges from police officers D belonging to the Pyeongtaek Police Station C District, the Defendant would be requested to pay taxi charges from the police officers of the Pyeongtaek Police Station C District,
Does the police;
The police is a huson dynasium.
“Abundance”, etc., and abundanced D’s chests and part by drinking.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention of crimes by police officers.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police against D;
1. E statements;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation;
1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;
1. In light of the fact that the crime of this case was committed in multiple times due to violence, including the same kind of crime with the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the punishment for the crime of this case is unlimited, but there is no record of punishment exceeding the fine, and other factors such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, etc., the punishment as the order shall be determined by taking into account the following factors: