Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine not exceeding five million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine not exceeding three million won.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant B, upon receipt of a report from around 00:49 on November 15, 2017, the Defendant removed H and A, which a slope G belonging to the F District of the Budget Police Station, called “three persons wraped in front of the E convenience store located in Chungcheongnam-nam Budget Group D,” and called “W and A, who is the police.”

“If you are removed by force from the police,” “Is the police.”

“Drather,” and “Drather,”

In the words "," the bridge of the above G was assaulted by walking on several occasions.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reports and the prevention of crimes by police officers.

2. Defendant A expressed a desire to stop fighting from the victim I (28 S) who was a policeman belonging to the F District of the Budget Police Station, the F District of the said date and time and place after receiving a report at the above 112, Defendant A expressed that “I would like to take advantage of the victim’s fighting,” “I am spacks so that I am spacks, spacks, spacks, and am spacks, spacks, and walks the victim’s left spacks by assaulting the victim’s spacks, spacks, and spacks that need to be treated for about two weeks.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reports and the prevention of crimes, and at the same time injured the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to I, J and G;

1. A detailed statement of reported case processing; and

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the records and opinions;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (Interference with the performance of official duties) and Article 257(1) (a) of the Criminal Act (a point of injury) Defendant B: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines;

1. Defendant A with an ordinary concurrence: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A who is selected to impose a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. The following circumstances are the reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the Defendants’ age, sex, environment, and the instant crime.