logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.10.30 2019고단4147
폭행등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violence;

A. On July 21, 2019, around 06:50 on July 21, 2019, the Defendant, in front of the toilet for the second floor “C” business establishment, did a dispute with the victim D (the age of 32)'s female-friendly job offers E and paths, and assaulted the victim's chest to the victim's face.

B. At the time and place mentioned in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant assaulted the victim E (V, 33 years old).

2. Around 06:50 on July 21, 2019, the Defendant insultd the victims by openly insulting the victims by referring to the police officers, guards, and I, who were called to the scene after receiving 112 reports due to the assault described in paragraph (1) in the case of assault described in paragraph (1), from among the actors, E, F, and D on the street of Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building B, and called “packs are booms, spons, several spons, a few sponss, sponss, sponss, the police bits, and sponss.”

3. At the time and place mentioned in paragraph (2), the Defendant: (a) performed an act of obstruction of performance of official duties on the date and place specified in paragraph (1); (b) performed an act of cutting down H’s flaps to check the identity of the police officer affiliated with the Guro Police Station that was dispatched to the scene after having her flabed off the H’s flab; and (c) committed an act of cutting off the chest on the face of the I to stop the act.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officials on the handling of 112 reported cases.

4. When the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender under suspicion of obstruction of the performance of official duties at the time and place mentioned in paragraph 3, the Defendant damaged the public object twice as follows. The Defendant 2nd lux of the J J J J J J J J J J slurged the part behind the front guard.

Accordingly, the Defendant, a public office, damaged patrol cars, which are goods used by the Guro Police Station G police box.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D, H and I;

1. The K's statement;

1. A survey report (related to the verification ofCCTV);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged by patrols;

1. Each relevant Article of the Act concerning criminal facts;

arrow