logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2013.11.29 2013고정427
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant invested in laundry operated by the Victim B (54 years old) but was unable to receive profits from laundry, and the Defendant was dissatisfied therewith.

On June 26, 2013, at around 20:40, the Defendant, in an excessive state in “D” operated by the victim in Mapopo City C, committed assault by booming the victim’s breath with her flap, by taking the victim’s flap with her hand.

2. When the Defendant, at the time and place as stipulated in Paragraph 1, received a check from the victim F of the Mana police box affiliated with the Mana police box, in contact with B’s report and dispatched at the same time and place as stipulated in Paragraph 1, the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties in relation to the police officer’s mobilization of the report by assaulting the F’s body several times and continuing to meet the F’s body with the wheels to carry out the F’s left part with the hand saw.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning B and F;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Reduction of the amount of fine in consideration of the relevant legal provision on the crime, the choice of punishment, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of each fine (the fact that the commission of a crime is recognized, the fact that the commission of a crime is against one another, there is no previous criminal record related to violence other than the commission of a fine of 300,000 won due to the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act in 2000, there is no penalty power after 200, the fact that a basic livelihood security recipient supports a baby who is not healthy due to negligence with her husband and his/her father, who is supported by

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow