A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 7, 2015, around June 21, 2015, the Defendant engaged in obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) on the front day of the “D Public Notice Board” located in Guro-gu Seoul, Guro-gu, Seoul; (b) on the same day, when receiving a penalty payment notice from F, who was dispatched to the site after receiving a report that there was a person who would be a disturbance due to his/her taking on the said day, and received a penalty payment notice from F, who was dispatched to the site; (c) and (d) committed assault, such as dives of the F, following the removal of the d Public Notice Board.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

2. On June 8, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. (Refence Violence, etc.) on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (hereinafter “D Publication Board”), around 23:50 on June 8, 2015, deemed that the victim G (the age of 55) made a statement from the police as a witness in relation to the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties as stipulated in paragraph (1), and said, the Defendant expressed the victim’s intent to “I reported, I would have reported, Chewing,” and sleeped the victim’s breath.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim in relation to his criminal case for the purpose of retaliation.

3. On June 8, 2015, the Defendant: (a) was informed of the fact that he was arrested as a flagrant offender at the time and place specified in paragraph (2); (b) and (c) reported the assault and damage to G at the place; and (d) was sent to the Guro police station Epiced by H during the process of having jurisdiction over the police box of the Guro police station, which was called “the bitbit of a bitch bitch of a bitch, fluor, fluor, and fluor of a fish”; (b) was threatening to fluen the drinking; and (c) assaulted the chest of

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

【Paragraph 1 of this Article】

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Statement of the police officer to G, F, and I;

1. Investigation report (in relation to the issuance of a warning slip to the accused and the act in the office of criminal prosecution).