1. The Defendant’s KRW 794,987,270 among the Plaintiff and KRW 591,550,028 among the Plaintiff, shall be KRW 62,09,07 from February 22, 2018.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff is a party to the dispute, etc. 1) The Plaintiff is a A apartment located in the Ysan-gu G in the Jeonsi-gu Seoul Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

(2) Around June 2012, the Defendant is an autonomous management body consisting of the occupants for the management of 560 households, and the Defendant is a project undertaker who sold the instant apartment, and the Defendant is a limited liability company B (hereinafter referred to as the “ Intervenor B”) to the Defendant, under contract with the Defendant for landscaping construction work among the instant apartment construction work. D (hereinafter referred to as the “ Intervenor C”) such as the Intervenor C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “ Intervenor A”) and the same E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “ Intervenor E”), from among the instant new apartment construction work, constructed eight sections for electrical construction from among the instant new apartment construction work. The Intervenor F (hereinafter referred to as the “ Intervenor F”) contracted from the Defendant for construction, machinery and civil engineering work among the instant new apartment construction work.

(hereinafter referred to as “the Intervenor” in the Defendant’s Intervenor. B.

The apartment of this case was inspected on December 20, 2013 and was delivered to the occupants who were the buyers around that time.

C. 1) Some of the construction works involved in the new apartment construction works in the instant case have failed to perform construction works, defective construction works, or alteration of the construction differently from the drawings, thereby causing defects such as equal heat and water leakage in the common areas and the section for exclusive use of the instant apartment. 2) Accordingly, the occupants have continuously requested the repair of defects against the Defendant immediately after the occupancy, and the Defendant has continuously repaired some defects that occurred in the instant apartment.

However, in the apartment of this case, the apartment of this case is still [Attachment 1], [Attachment 2], and [Attachment 2], each attachment file of the “bundling Costs for Remuneration by List of Defects in the Section for Common Use.”