beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 4,512,619,803 among the Plaintiff and KRW 201,00,000 among the Plaintiff, shall be KRW 1,921,793,481 from June 5, 2015.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. (1) The Plaintiff is an autonomous management organization that consists of occupants to manage the 16-dong 16-dong 1062 apartment units in Pakistan-si (hereinafter “instant apartment”).
[A] Evidence 10 (including paper numbers, if there is no indication of the number, it shall be deemed to include the number), appraiser C (hereinafter “Appraiser”)
(2) The Defendant (the Korea National Housing Corporation and the Korea Land Corporation were merged on October 1, 2009, and the Defendant was the Defendant; hereinafter, “Defendant”) constructed and sold the apartment of this case.
(A) evidence of heading 2, 3.2
The apartment of this case, which caused defects, had undergone a pre-use inspection on June 10, 201 (Evidence 3 of the A), and had been occupied from June 30, 201 (Evidence 4-1 of the A), and there was a defect such as rupture, water leakage, etc. in the section for exclusive use and section for common use of the instant apartment due to the Defendant’s failure to construct the part to be constructed in accordance with the design drawing in the new construction of the instant apartment, different from the drawing, or inadequate construction, unlike the drawing.
Accordingly, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to repair defects from the time of occupancy (Evidence No. 4), and the repair work was conducted for some defects, but there still remains any defects such as the sum calculation of repair costs by the defect list of attached section 1 and the sum calculation of repair costs by the defect list of attached section 2, in the section for exclusive use and section for common use of the apartment of this case (hereinafter “the defect of this case”).
[The result of the expert testimony by the expert witness, the result of each request for the supplementation of the expert witness by this court(hereinafter referred to as "each request for the supplementation of the expert witness").
[C] .
The Plaintiff’s transfer of the damage claim is a substitute for the repair of defects in the apartment of this case that he had against the Defendant from the sectional owners of 1,047 households among the 1,062 households of this case (hereinafter “transfer household of this case”).