logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.11.13 2014고합346
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동공갈)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months.

However, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. On June 2014, Defendants in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint conflict) proposed to the effect that “E, who was known to the police officer at ordinary time, sought from the male who want to engage in sexual traffic by holding a portable telephone with him/her, and went to the roadside.” They accepted the proposal that “E accepts the proposal to the effect that “I will remove money by deceiving the male to the mother, and divide part of the money into the future.”

On June 23, 2014, in collusion with E, the Defendants posted a statement to the effect that “I are minors.... people are wanting to do so by drinking in the telecom,” and promised to do so in the vicinity of the victim G (30 years of age) and the road basin where I would like to do so. The Defendants sent the victim waiting in the surrounding area and sent the victim to the Felel room located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H, and told the Defendants to find the victim into the above telecom room. The Defendants requested the victim to take identification cards at the same place and to take photographs, “I want to do so by forcing the victim to do so, I would like to do so, and I would like to have the victim do so, and I would like to have the victim do so by forcing the victim to do so: 30 days after I would have come to know that I would have to do so.” The Defendants would have been forced to do so by sexual traffic: The Defendants would have to do so by allowing the victim to do so in the front of the police bank.

B. As above, the Defendants conspired with E in collusion with the victim I by threatening the victim I in a place where it is not possible to know at the lower court’s place on June 2014, and by threatening the victim I in such a way as above, amounting to eight million won from the food victim.

arrow