logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.01.23 2014고단3596
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동공갈)등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

Defendants are people without a certain occupation.

1. The Defendants’ co-principal

A. (1) On August 18, 2014, the Defendants used the Felel operated by the victims in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City to engage in sexual traffic with the mediation of G around the 17th day of the same month by Defendant B, who was the victim’s wife, and Defendant B acted as a juvenile under the age, and Defendant A threatened the victim to the effect that “A is a juvenile who engaged in sexual traffic, and would report without giving money,” and received KRW 260,000 on the job from the victim who was sexually fel, and then returned to the above Felel around the 20th day of the same month to the effect that “I would report to the police if I would inform the victim of sexual disease examination expenses,” and received KRW 330,000,000 from the victim who was drinking.

As a result, the Defendants shared the victims and received a total of KRW 590,000.

(2) On August 25, 2014, the Defendants: (a) threatened the victim with “I will not pay money; (b)” and, if the victim did not comply with the request, by means of intimidation in a manner that appears to have the same attitude to report to the police; and (c) attempted to receive additional money and valuables from the victim of frighten drinking, but (d) instead, the Defendants fled the victim to report to the police.

As a result, the Defendants attempted to take money by threatening the victim, but did not bring about such intent and did not commit an attempted crime.

B. From August 2014 to September 1, 2014, the Defendants committed the crime against the victim H at the Jindo’s meeting with the victim’s operation in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Defendant A first conducted sexual traffic with the victim’s assistance, and then Defendant B expressed the same attitude to report to the police on how to allow the juvenile to engage in sexual traffic.

arrow