1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 5,970,418; (b) KRW 34,072,80 to Plaintiff B; (c) KRW 29,358,600 to Plaintiff C; and (d) KRW 16,828 to Plaintiff D.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business approval and announcement - Business Name: A Bogeumjari Housing District Development Project (E II): A public announcement: F published by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on December 3, 2009 and G published by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on April 27, 2010; A project operator: Defendant;

(b) The Central Land Expropriation Committee’s ruling on expropriation on October 19, 2012 - Land subject to expropriation: Each land indicated in attached Form 2 (hereinafter “each land of this case”) - The date of commencement of expropriation: An appraisal corporation on December 12, 2012 - An appraisal corporation on light of the day of expropriation and a dialogue appraisal corporation (hereinafter “appraisal for expropriation”)

C. Determination by the Central Land Tribunal on July 18, 2013 - Compensation: Each statement in the column for objection among the details of compensation attached to attached Form 2 - An appraisal corporation: The same as the statement in the column for objection of the amount of compensation - An appraisal corporation: The central appraisal corporation and the Korea Land Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as “appraisal for adjudication” in combination with an appraiser for expropriation adjudication; hereinafter referred to as “adjudication”) / No dispute over the results of each appraisal / [based on recognition] - The statement in Gap’s subparagraphs 1, 2, Eul’s subparagraphs 1, 2, 1, 2, 3 and 4 (including the number of pages

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) Of the 3,892 square meters of land owned by the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff’s appraiser was 76 square meters of land assessed as a road, 121 square meters of land assessed as a road by the Plaintiff’s appraiser among the 76 square meters of land assessed as a road, 2,261 square meters of land owned by the Plaintiff’s 12,261 square meters of land owned by the Plaintiff, and 6 square meters of land assessed as a road by the Plaintiff’s appraiser among the 121 square meters of land owned by the Plaintiff’s 2,929 square meters of land owned by

A) Although the actual use status of the pertinent land is not a road, the adjudication appraiser’s appraisal of the said land is unlawful. The pertinent land of this case should be assessed on the premise that its actual use status is “presure” and “responding”. 2) The actual use status of the pertinent land of this case, which is 55 square meters and 20 square meters assessed by the adjudication appraiser as a ditch (hereinafter “the pertinent land of this case”) among the 2,929 square meters in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.