1. The Defendant: KRW 7,264,80 for Plaintiff A; KRW 85,166,50 for Plaintiff B; KRW 40,768,650 for Plaintiff C; and KRW 7,12 for Plaintiff D.

1. Circumstances and results of appraisal of the ruling;

(a) Business authorization and public notice - H housing project name: H housing project (I; hereinafter “instant project”): The defendant, publicly notified by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on December 3, 2009 and publicly notified by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on April 27, 2010

B. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on expropriation on October 19, 2012 - Articles subject to expropriation: The same shall apply to the description in the column of “goods subject to expropriation” of the attached list of compensation for losses under the location of Seocheon-gu L.

- Commencement Date of expropriation: - An appraisal corporation on December 12, 2012 - An appraisal corporation: An appraisal corporation, an appraisal corporation, a large-day appraisal corporation, a light appraisal corporation, a joint appraisal corporation, and a joint appraisal corporation’s dialogue appraisal corporation - Compensation for losses: The same shall apply to the statement in the column for the appraisal value

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on an objection made on July 18, 2013 - An appraisal business entity: the first appraisal corporation, the country’s appraisal corporations, the central appraisal corporations, the Korea Land Appraisal Corporation, the Korea Land Appraisal Corporation, and the Korea Land Appraisal Corporation: Compensation for losses: The same shall apply to the statement in the “amount assessed on the objection” list.

The result of the court's entrustment of appraisal of appraiser M (hereinafter "court appraisal") - Compensation for losses: The details of compensation for losses are as stated in the column of "amount of court appraisal" in the separate sheet of compensation for losses.

[Ground of Recognition] A without dispute; Gap evidence 1 through 3, 2-1 through 6, 3-1 through 3, 4-1 through 6, Eul evidence 1-4, 1-1 through 4, and 2-1 through 4; the result of the appraisal commission to appraiser M by this court; the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the plaintiffs' claims

A. The part related to a ditch site 1) Plaintiff B and G are as follows: ① Plaintiff B owned by the Plaintiff: ① 2,136 square meters in the 2,136 square meters in the 2,136 square meters in Seocheon-gu N, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si; ② 40 square meters in the 284 square meters in the 284 square meters in the 2000 square meters in the 284 square meters in the 2004 square meters in the 20002

Since it is improper to evaluate B as a ditch, it is improper to evaluate B as a ditch, it is the first-class land of this case.