A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

One (No. 1) shall be confiscated on the seized mobile phone charging machine.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 27, 2014, at around 20:15, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “I would like to recover the place of accommodation up to the Pyeongtaek-gun dialogue and return to the Crossing-Eup again, and pay the charges to I would like to pay I would soon.”

In fact, however, there was no intention or ability to pay taxi user fees to the victim.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim, had the victim take aboard from that time until 22:31 of the same day, and had the victim operate the taxi from approximately 120 km section, thereby acquiring financial benefits equivalent to the same amount of money by failing to pay it.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired financial benefits by deceiving the victim.

2. The Defendant, at around 22:20 on May 27, 2014, abused the victim G (the age of 51) who was the circumstances leading to the said district unit E, in order to investigate the case described in paragraph (1), committed assault by the Defendant, such as: (a) the victim G (the age of 51) who was the circumstance leading to the said district unit, in a cell phone charging with the victim’s personal information on one occasion; (b) the victim H (the age of 41), who was the circumstance leading to the said district unit, was able to display the victim’s face on one occasion; and (c) the victim H (the age of 41), who was the circumstance leading to the said district unit, was able to control the Defendant.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of the victims' criminal investigation, and at the same time, the victim G with an inner part that requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and the victim H with a chest tag that requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

3. The Defendant, at around 22:35 on May 27, 2014, arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender committing obstruction of performance of official duties due to the act referred to in paragraph (2) and the act referred to in paragraph (2), as the victim at the seat of the said taxi engineer C.