1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant ordering payment exceeding the following part ordering payment.

Basic Facts

-

2. The reasoning of this Court regarding this defense is as follows, and the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this part of the judgment regarding this defense is cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

(2) On April 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010.2) E used Defendant’s card members’ personal information stored and used normally at the Defendant’s head office located in X-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, and 1,0230,000 customer information stored in the Defendant’s card members’ card, but without using the Defendant’s hard disc format security inspection without using the Defendant’s hard disc format and without using the Defendant’s hard disc format security inspection, 201, 201, 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.

C) After that, around February 2014, E and L, containing the Defendant’s above card customer information, were seized by an investigative agency. On L’s hard disks, approximately KRW 2,50,000 of the above card customer information (credit rating 6-8 and D’s name, address, telephone number, etc. are stored.