logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.01.10 2018가단5139206
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The defendant stated in [Attachment 2] the plaintiffs' "whether to leak in 2010" in the "2010" target of outflow port (2010).

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The introduction and operation of the card accident analysis system is running businesses such as the issuance, sale, and management of credit cards, pre-paid cards, and debit cards. In 2006, the Defendant introduced the card accident analysis system (FDS) and implemented improvement work to detect abnormal transactions or fraudulent use due to theft, loss, forgery, etc. of credit cards.

B. The Defendant requested the FDS development service and the provision of customer information on the card (1) to H (hereinafter “H”) or I (hereinafter “I”) for the FDS business operation.

(2) The J has been engaged in H employee from October 2009 to April 2010, and I employee from September 2013 to December 2013, 2013, while the said company engaged in the business of developing and installing the FDS entrusted by the Defendant, and used the FDS development and installation work after being provided with card customer information not converted from the Defendant.

C. Around April 2010, the Defendant provided H employees with customer information on a card, but around April 2010, H employees received equipment entry certificates only for the computers brought into the Defendant’s office for the FDS business operation, and did not grasp the quantity of external and external hard disks. Upon completion of the work at the Defendant’s office, the Defendant instructed H employees to read the hard disc format and did not directly monitor whether the hard disc was format or format.

(2) Around April 2010, J does not thoroughly control and supervise the Defendant’s cargo to prevent the storage and release of the card customer information on the hard disc carried in. Around April 2010, the Defendant’s office stores and uses the customer information in the Defendant’s hard disc for business purposes after storing and using the customer information in the Defendant’s hard disc for business purposes. Around July 2010, the J did not form a hard disc for business purposes and used it on its own computer.

arrow