1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part of the plaintiffs' claim against Defendant B Co., Ltd. stated in the list of plaintiffs is as follows.

1. The reasoning for this part of the underlying facts is as follows, except for the following changes, the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is identical to the corresponding part of “1. Basic Facts” and thus, the corresponding part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

Part 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be amended from 7th to 4th (1.c. 1) as follows:

C) Defendant A provided Defendant D with card customer information without converting it to Defendant D. The employees of Defendant D stored the said card customer information on the computer for business purposes, and used the said card customer information in the manner of sharing the storage pool. From July 6 to 15 of the first instance judgment (1.c.)

2) A) The J changed the following. (A) The Defendant L Center came to know of the fact that it could store files connecting the USB domains because it did not install a security program on its own business use while performing the FDS development work. (b) around February 2013, the J copied the card customer information stored in the co-owned brand at the Defendant L Center to its own business use without the installation of a security program, and copied it to Defendant A’s own USB domains, which had been arbitrarily brought into the said computer, by linking the said computer’s own USB cameras, which had been 5,378,00 won by copying it to the above USB cameras.

J copied the above disclosed information at one’s own home, and then copied the information stored at the above computer on April 2013, to one’s own hard disc.

The 9th to 10th to 9th 10th 1th 2th 2th 3th 2th 3th 3th 2

2) On April 2010, J around April 2010, around 2010, it stored approximately 1,0230,000 customer information under Defendant B’s member B’s customer information stored and used normally at Defendant B’s head office located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and around April 2010, Defendant B stored fDS development work.