A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On June 14, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of a fine of 1.5 million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Gwangju District Court's net support on June 14, 2007, and received a summary order of a fine of 2 million won for the same crime in the same court on October 19, 2009.

[Criminal facts]

1. On July 23, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) and the Road Traffic Act (Drocketing driving) on the road from the front day of the X-ray tourist hotel (former department store) to the front day of the “C” store located in the same city B at around 50 meters, without obtaining a driver’s license, while under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.124% during blood.

Accordingly, the defendant, who violated the prohibition of drinking at least twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of the above provision.

2. The Defendant’s unlawful uttering of official document was discovered by drinking while driving the said vehicle before the above stores on the day, and was demanded to present a driver’s license from E in the circumstances in which the traffic control division belongs to the leisure police station.

In this regard, the defendant, who was on the top of the above vehicle, presented the F's first class ordinary driver's license in the name of the National Police Agency in the name of the South Korean National Police Agency, which is an official document taken by the defendant F, who was on the top of the above vehicle, as if he was the driver's license.

Accordingly, the defendant did not use official documents.

3. The Defendant, at the above date and at the above time and place, signed a signature on the “Driver F” side signature column of the inquiry about the result of regulating the driving of portable information terminals, which was presented by E for hiding drinking and unlicensed driving.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged the above F’s signature for the purpose of exercising the right.

4. The Defendant at the above date, time, and at the above place, inquired of the outcome of the crackdown on drinking driving, in which the signature of F, forged, was written.