1. The defendant's KRW 50 million and its 17% per annum from June 1, 1997 to November 23, 1997 to the plaintiff.

1. According to the reasoning of Gap evidence No. 1 and No. 4 of the judgment as to the cause of the claim and all the arguments, the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. has a loan claim of KRW 100 million against the defendant (hereinafter "the claim of this case"). The above claim was transferred before transfer and transferred to E Co., Ltd.; E Co., Ltd. has won the lawsuit claiming the claim of this case against the defendant under Seoul Central District Court Decision 2009Da41819, and the judgment became final and conclusive; the claim of this case was transferred before transfer and transferred to the plaintiff; the plaintiff filed the lawsuit of this case for the extension of the extinctive prescription period of the claim of this case on April 7, 2020; according to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is obligated to pay the amount of KRW 50 million from the day following the date of the loan to 190 million until 19% per annum 29% per annum from June 1 through 1, 197 to 198% per annum 198.

2. As to the judgment on the Defendant’s assertion, the Defendant was exempted from the obligation of this case. However, according to the overall purport of the statement and pleading in the evidence Nos. 1 through 3, F was exempted from the obligation to the Suwon District Court No. 2013, 4585, and the Defendant’s assertion on this part is not considered to have been exempted from the exemption of the obligation of this case. Accordingly, the Defendant’s assertion on this part is rejected.

3. The plaintiff's claim is accepted on the ground of the reasoning.