Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. In the facts charged, the Defendant was boarding the victim B(62) taxi in front of the victim B(62) on the road in Ansan-do 6-dong, Ansan-dong.
On April 3, 2016, around 07:48, the Defendant entered the place near the house of the Defendant of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government apartment complex, and did not pay the taxi fee, and the Defendant disembarked from the taxi without paying the taxi fee, and the victim’s unloading from the taxi fee of KRW 45,420,” and the Defendant’s defective victim “Chman’s fee”;
Sedden dyna
A bitch bit, bitch, farch, farc, darc, darc, darc, and darc, darc, at the house, and the victim abused the victim by drinking the victim's face two times, on the ground that the victim's face may vary between the apartment entrance and the fee, depending on the apartment entrance.
2. Determination
(a) Crimes of non-violation of intention (Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act);
B. Withdrawal of wishing to punish the victim after the indictment of this case
C. Judgment dismissing public prosecution (Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act)