logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.08.24 2017고단4991
모욕
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 16, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 02:20 on May 16, 2017, the Defendant: (b) was driving police officers under the influence of drinking prior to the funeral of Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, on the ground that the police officers under the influence of drinking did not control the taxi drivers for business purposes; (c) on the ground that the police officers, who are the police officers belonging to the Bupyeong-gu Police Station, did not control the taxi drivers; and (d) was growing down

si is under the influence of the taxi and why is under the control of other vehicles;

C. We expressed that C. Hashes Hashes expressed expressed that “Is Hashes Hashes Hashes,” both of whom are “Is.”

When the Defendant continued to demand that the victim slope D, a police officer belonging to the Bupyeong Police Station, restrain the Defendant and return home, the Defendant followed the Defendant “Isle, Isle, Isle, Isle, Isnish, Isle, Isnish, Isle.”

나랑 맞짱 한번 뜰까 너 따라와 봐, 병신 너 쫄았냐

왜 안 따라와 병신 씨 발 새끼 쫄았네

“The expression “ was made”.

Accordingly, the defendant insultd the victims openly.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or C;

1. E statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (victim D submitted video analysis);

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The fact that the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (hereinafter “Criminal Procedure Act”) of the Criminal Procedure Act has many criminal offenses, such as interference with the performance of official duties and insult, is disadvantageous to the defendant, and the defendant recognized his/her mistake and reflects his/her mistake, the circumstances surrounding the crime and the circumstances after the crime are considered favorable, taking into account favorable circumstances, and determine the punishment as set forth in the order, taking into account all the factors such as the defendant’s age, sexual conduct, family relationship, property status

arrow