logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2013.06.19 2013고단531
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

10,000,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant violated the Game Industry Promotion Act, the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, etc., is the actual owner of “D” of “D” of Jinju-si, and E, F, G, and H are those who worked in the above game room as employees.

From January 19, 201 to March 15:20, 201, from around 19, 201 to March 14, 2011, the Defendant established a “Yamato” game program that was rated after registering a juvenile game providing business in the above H’s name, and did not receive a business server rating from 40 units of the “Pamatod” game, and exchanged in cash the amount of KRW 10,000 if the said employees employed the said employees, and the customers begin to put 10,000 bills into the game machine, and the points were added to the points when the automatic game was carried out until the price falls, and then the points were added to a certain shape, and caused customers to carry out the game in a manner that discharges one book free gift per 5,000 points, and the amount of free gift generated by the games was deducted by 10%,50,500 won, which was deducted.

As a result, the defendant provided game products not classified for use, and exchanged of tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products for business purposes, and operated speculative acts by using speculative amusement equipment.

2. Around 15:00 on June 15, 201, when the Defendant received a request from the victim I to receive and receive a successful bid for corporeal movables, singing machines, etc. kept on J 1st, J Do, J Do, J Do, which is an auction object, and on the same day, received KRW 3 million as a bid deposit, and allowed K to participate in the bid using the said money, but failed to receive a successful bid, while the Defendant received the said money from K and kept the said money for the victim, the Defendant embezzled it on June 17, 201, by arbitrarily granting it to L as personnel expenses for the trees he employs.

3. The Defendant was performing visual operation at a N Hospital in Jinju-si around 2007.

arrow