beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and two months, and for a defendant B, for six months, respectively.
However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A
A. (1) On August 4, 2010, the Defendant violated the Game Industry Promotion Act: (a) registered a juvenile game providing business with the trade name “E Gameland” under the name of “E Game City”; (b) from around November 2010 to December 17, 2010, the Defendant offered KRW 40 for the Paris Game machine 40 for the year when the total amount of use was rated on the second floor of Jinju-si 2 from around December 29, 2010; and (c) without being rated on the fourth unit of the Mro-ro game machine, the Defendant offered KRW 10,000 for the customers to use the game machine; and (d) from the beginning of the game machine, the points amounting to KRW 10,00 for the customers to KRW 10,000; and (d) 4) one for the first five for the first five for the first five for the first five for the first five for the first five for the first for the first five for the first for the first one.
(2) The Defendant violated the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry and the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, etc., allowed customers to play the “live game” game at the above time and place, and allowed customers to play the game in cash by exchanging 4,500 won, which is the difference between 10% of the commission, and 10% of the commission, and allowing customers to play the game in the above game place.
In this regard, the defendant was engaged in exchanging the results obtained by using game products as a business, and engaged in speculative activities by using speculative recreation equipment.
(3) Around July 2010, the Defendant suggested that “I will operate one more amusement rooms in the country, ask for the heads of B's branch offices, and, if doing so, I will make an amount calculated as KRW 50,000 per day when doing business.” Upon the above B’s consent, I had B registered as the business operator of the E Gameland.
On December 29, 2010, the Defendant knew on the fact that the game site was controlled by the Defendant, and he does not walk the phone to B and get token.