1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation.

In accordance with the Act on the Establishment and Operation of A, a national university, which was established on October 1946, the Plaintiff is a major business entity that employs approximately 7,100 workers on a regular basis in accordance with the Act on the Establishment and Operation of A, a national university, which is converted into a corporation on December 28, 201, and conducts education to cultivate research spirit and creativity and foster human resources.

On January 7, 2001, the number of union members as a regional-level industrial trade union established for the organization of all workers in the Seoul metropolitan area is about 3,00.

A superior organization is a C organization, and its affiliated branch is established on November 1, 201, and approximately 450 workers of the facility management belonging to the plaintiff are engaged in activities.

The E-Trade Union is a national industrial trade union established on November 6, 1998 with workers at national higher education institutions as the organization of workers, and a higher organization is a C organization.

There are branches affiliated with the intervenor, and there are approximately 210 workers belonging to the plaintiff in the above branches.

On April 2, 2018, an intervenor asserted to the Seoul Regional Labor Relations Commission that “the type of facility management should be separated from the type of facility management at the negotiating unit of the plaintiff” and applied for a decision on the division of bargaining units.

On May 2, 2018, the Seoul Regional Labor Relations Commission accepted the Plaintiff’s application for a decision on the division of bargaining units on the ground that “the need to separate facility management positions by separate bargaining units is recognized, such as there is a substantial difference between the Plaintiff’s facility management position and other types of occupation and there exists a difference in the employment form.”

On May 25, 2018, the Plaintiff filed an application for review with the Central Regional Labor Relations Commission seeking revocation of the said decision.

On June 22, 2018, the National Labor Relations Commission dismissed the plaintiff's application for reexamination on the same ground as the initial inquiry tribunal.

(hereinafter “this case’s review decision”). 【No dispute exists, entry of Gap’s evidence Nos. 1 through 3, and the purport of the entire pleading, whether the Plaintiff’s assertion of legitimacy of the review decision of this case’s review is included in the unit of self-employee bargaining.

The type of employment of its own staff; and