Text
1. On September 17, 2018, the National Labor Relations Commission separates the central 2018 negotiation units between the Plaintiff and the Intervenor joining the Defendant.
Reasons
1. Details of the decision on retrial;
A. The Plaintiff is a corporation established pursuant to A law to stabilize the prices of agricultural products, etc. and stabilize the supply and demand of agricultural products, etc., and employs approximately 80 full-time workers.
B. On November 30, 2006, the Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “ Intervenor”) was established as an industrial trade union at a national level, which was established with the organization of workers engaged in the social service business of public agencies, etc., and the transportation service business of railroads, buses, etc., with the organization of employees, the superior organization is the C.C. Federation Federation. On May 31, 2018, the Defendant established B Association A branch (hereinafter referred to as the “instant branch”).
C. A trade union (hereinafter “instant trade union”) is a company-level trade union established on January 28, 1989 with the organization of full-time workers of class III or below, and a higher organization is a D Total Association Federation, and 515 members were members around July 2018.
On June 28, 2018, an intervenor filed an application to separate a unit that shall determine a representative bargaining trade union (hereinafter “negotiation unit”) on the grounds that there is a significant difference between the Plaintiff’s ordinary workers (hereinafter “regular workers”) and regular workers (hereinafter “regular workers”) in terms of the working conditions, etc. However, the former Regional Labor Relations Commission did not have a significant difference in the working conditions of ordinary workers and regular workers on July 30, 2018, and it is difficult to view that there is a significant difference in the employment conditions in the form of employment. In the form of employment, it is difficult to recognize the intrinsic difference in the form of employment. There is no practice of separate negotiations for ordinary workers, and there is no difference in the benefits that can be gained by separating the bargaining unit, and made a decision to dismiss the said application (hereinafter “original decision”).
E. An intervenor on August 17, 2018