beta
Text
1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff entered the Army on April 21, 2009, and was transferred to the Army on January 15, 2010, and was discharged from active service on January 14, 2017.
B. On July 14, 2017, the Plaintiff made a statement to the Defendant as follows (hereinafter “instant injury”) and applied for registration of a person of distinguished service to the State by entering the application form “damage to the inner fluoral land and power lines on the part of the heading and heading parts” and “damage to the inner fluoral land and power lines” (hereinafter “instant injury”).
‘원고는 2014. 9.경 참가한 연대 전술훈련 중에, 그리고 2014. 10.경 군 전투지휘훈련 중에 왼쪽과 오른쪽 발목이 돌부리에 걸려 발목을 접질리기를 반복하였는데, 훈련일정 등으로 군 병원 진료를 제대로 받지 못하고 휴가기간 동안 1~2회 정도 물리치료를 받았으나 통증이 심해졌고, 임무수행에 지장이 있을 것을 우려해 참고 견뎠는데, 2016. 6.경 중대 ASP파견근무 중 양쪽 발목에 통증이 심해져서 부대 복귀 후 국군춘천병원에서 MRI를 촬영한 결과 발목 부분의 염좌 및 긴장으로 통증이 지속되어, 외부병원에서 정밀검사를 받은 결과 양측 전경골비골 인대 부분 파열로 진단받게 되어, 2016. 11.경 오른쪽 발목을 먼저 수술 받고 전역 후 2017. 7. 11. 국군수도병원에서 왼쪽도 수술 받았다‘
C. On February 8, 2018, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of a non-specific decision on the requirements for a person who rendered distinguished services to the State and a person eligible for veteran’s compensation on December 12, 2017 (hereinafter “instant Disposition 1”) and a non-specific decision on the requirements for a person eligible for veteran’s compensation (hereinafter “instant Disposition 2”).
On March 9, 2018, the Plaintiff filed an objection against the instant Disposition Nos. 1 and 2, but the Defendant rendered a decision to maintain the instant Disposition Nos. 1 and 2 on July 12, 2018.
[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 2, 3, and Eul No. 1.