beta
Text
1. On June 25, 2012, around 14:50, the Defendant was driving B vehicles around 116, Dobong-gu, Changdong 2, Dobong-gu, Dobong-gu, Seoul.
Reasons
1. The facts below are without dispute between the parties, or may be acknowledged upon full consideration of the whole purport of the pleadings in each entry in Gap evidence 1 to 6. A.
With the Defendant’s wife D, the Plaintiff entered into an insurance contract for a business car that covers the Defendant’s insurance period from July 3, 2011 to July 3, 2012, with respect to B vehicles owned by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”) with the Defendant’s wife D, namely, personal injury I, personal injury II, personal injury II, personal injury, and personal injury only to the Defendant.
B. As to the general terms and conditions of the instant insurance contract’s liability for personal compensation II, the term “damage incurred when an insured motor vehicle repeatedly uses or leases an insured motor vehicle for the purpose of fare or consideration where it is a passenger car or passenger car (b)” is defined as non-compensation exemption clause (hereinafter “compensation exemption clause”).
C. On November 25, 201, during the term of the instant insurance contract, D added “a special agreement for oil transport to which the insurance is applied,” and terminated the said special agreement for commercial transport on June 19, 2012.
The Defendant had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had
E. However, on June 25, 2012, the Defendant caused an accident of shocking C’s children crossing the road in front of the 116-dong, Dobong-gu, Dobong-gu, Seoul, by driving the instant vehicle and leaving English kindergarten students at around 14:50 (hereinafter “instant accident”).
2. According to the above facts of recognition as to the plaintiff's claim, the accident of this case aims at the price of the defendant.