beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to C Vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff vehicle”). The Defendant is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to D Vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).
B. (1) On February 23, 2018, the Plaintiff’s vehicle stopped on the lane in the form of passing the three-lanes of the instant road while driving along a six-lane road near the Seoul Arts Center (hereinafter “instant road”) around the 1st Government of Dong-si, the Government of the Gu, while driving along the six-lane road near the Seoul Arts Center (hereinafter “instant road”). As such, the Plaintiff’s vehicle stopped on the lane in the form of passing along the three-lanes of the instant road.
(2) After the first accident, the Plaintiff’s vehicle, which took place on the said lane, had impact on the side of the Plaintiff’s driver’s seat (hereinafter “the second accident”). (3) The Plaintiff’s vehicle was destroyed by the fronter, fronter and fronter, fronter and rearer on the left side, the left-hand part of the vehicle, and the left-hand part-hand part of the traffic accident report prepared by the Road Traffic Accident Assessment Board E (Evidence No. 8 of the Plaintiff’s vehicle). The damage caused by the Plaintiff’s front-hand part of the vehicle was analyzed as two times from the left-hand side of the vehicle, and the damage caused by the Plaintiff’s front-hand part of the vehicle was presumed to have been shocked on the road surface by moving the vehicle to the second collision after the first collision with the Defendant’s vehicle, and it was also analyzed as follows: the front left-hand part of the vehicle; and the front-hand part of the vehicle’s front-hand part of the vehicle.
C. (1) The Plaintiff’s vehicle model is the type of the Plaintiff’s vehicle in 2014 BMW 520d, and the Plaintiff’s value of the Plaintiff’s vehicle at the time of entering into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the Plaintiff’s vehicle on September 4, 2017.