Defendant

B A limited liability company shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Defendant

A reasonable fine shall be imposed on a limited liability company B.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B A limited liability company is a corporation established for electronic commerce such as internet auction.

No person shall use raw materials for cosmetics, sell cosmetics which fail to meet safety management standards for distributed cosmetics, or manufacture, import, store or display cosmetics for sale.

Nevertheless, the defendant from May 25, 2012 to the same year.

5. From the 31th day of the above office, E, an employee of the defendant, uses a computer installed in the above office to deal with the defendant's business, and sells 302 cosmetics containing a mixture-prohibited material to non-consumers through F, a website, 302 'envy', 15', 'envy soft &thin', 62, 51, 'envy soft &thatte', and 141', respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against Defendant A

1. A written confirmation of the document prepared by G;

1. Description of the relevant materials of cosmetics ingredients;

1. Entry of Internet data;

1. The entry E in sales data is written as a person in charge of the cosmetic of this case;

(See, see, e.g., Investigation Records)

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes written in contract;

1. Article 39, Article 36 (1) 3, and subparagraph 5 of Article 15 of the relevant Act on Criminal Facts;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Defendant A

A. The Defendant in this part of the facts charged is the representative director of B limited liability company, which is social money company in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H.

The Defendant sold cosmetics containing Ma, as stated in its reasoning, at the date, time, and place of the ruling with E.

B. The Defendant asserts that he was appointed as the representative director of the B Limited Company B (hereinafter “instant company”) from June 5, 2012, which was after the sales period indicated in this part of the facts charged, and that he did not participate in the said sale.

I am the evidence that seems to correspond to this part of the facts charged.