logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2018.11.27 2018고정799
화장품법위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Defendant

A above.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B Co., Ltd. is a company engaged in the sale of cosmetics and non-pharmaceutical drugs in Yangju-si, and Defendant A is a representative director of the above company who operates the sale of cosmetics and non-pharmaceutical drugs.

1. Defendant A

(a) A person who intends to distribute or sell non-registered cosmetics imported from the distribution or sale of non-registered cosmetics shall register the cosmetics with the Minister of Food and Drug Safety as a business of manufacturing and selling cosmetics;

Nevertheless, from April 2013 to July 2016, the Defendant sold imported cosmetics, such as shampoo and shampoo, shampoo, shampoo, and chrop dHC-N (def cosmetics) imported through cosmeticD without registering the cosmetic manufacture-sale business.

(b) No person who sells cosmetics using any raw material that is prohibited from using shall use or distribute cosmetics that are not usable for cosmetics, sell cosmetics that are not in compliance with safety management standards, or manufacture, import, keep or display cosmetics for the purpose of sale;

Nevertheless, from January 2015 to July 2016, the Defendant sold dance shampoo and shampoo and shampoo, sc-N (deflad cosmetics) in which shampoo and shampoo and shampoo and sc-N (deflad cosmetics) can not be used for cosmetics through the Internet shopping mall.

(c)

No labeling or advertising dealer who is likely to mislead himself/herself into thinking the cosmetics are medicines shall place any indication or advertisement likely to mislead himself/herself into thinking the cosmetics are medicines.

Nevertheless, from April 2013 to July 2016, the Defendant: (a) on the Internet site (E) at Yangju-si; (b) on the Internet site (E), the effect of the Defendant’s shampoo and shoo that produces 1. rhythr;

2. Fungamination and overfungibibation, “Pirocination”, “Piccination and overfibibibation”, “Piccination and rhymosis effect of a fibibroke, suppression of suppression,” and “Piccination and rhym therapy of biccinites, rhym therapy, and prevention of suppression.”

arrow