Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

At around 17:50 on February 9, 2020, the Defendant: (a) reported that D party members including Victim C (A, 65 years of age), including the victim at the entrance of the B market at Sinung-si, were holding an “E release campaign assembly;” and (b) committed assault against the victim, such as the victim’s shoulder by blocking the front of the Defendant’s street, and the victim’s body was tightly tightly sealed by the victim, while the victim and the victim were in dispute with the victim, which caused the victim’s “mathing of the present government.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field photographs, CCTV reports (verification of CCTVs in place), report on internal investigation (verification of wire tubes related to this case), and report on internal investigation (Attachment to images submitted on the victim's side);

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act Article 334(1) of the Act on the Provisional Payment Order under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act is that the degree of assault of this case is not limited, and that the defendant gives advice to the victim during the assembly.

A punishment shall be determined as ordered by taking into account all the circumstances shown in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., where the victim tried to leave the place, and the victim's side seems to have been prevented, contingently resulting in the crime of this case, the defendant has no other criminal records except for the punishment of fines twice prior to 2000, and the defendant has recognized and reflected his mistake, and the defendant is against himself, and the punishment shall be determined as ordered by the order.