1. The Defendant’s KRW 362,140,050 as well as 5% per annum from April 17, 2012 to August 14, 2014 to the Plaintiff.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business approval and public notice - Business name: Bogeumjari Housing project (B; hereinafter “instant project”): Defendant

(b) The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on expropriation on March 16, 2012 - The objects of expropriation shall be as specified in the column for objects of expropriation of the detailed list of compensation;

(hereinafter referred to as "each of the lands in this case" shall be deemed to be "each of the lands in this case", and when individually referred to, "the land in this case" shall be deemed to be "the land in this case") - Compensation amount: The same shall apply to the entry in the column for the amount of adjudication

- The date of commencement of expropriation: Each entry into the appraisal corporation for a stock company, one appraisal corporation for a stock company (hereinafter referred to as "appraisal for a ruling," and "appraisal for a ruling"), [based on recognition], the absence of dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1 and 2 (including the number of branch numbers, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply), and the purport of the whole pleadings, as a whole.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The summary of the plaintiff's assertion 1) The appraisal of each land of this case and the result of the appraisal entrustment to appraiser D of this court (hereinafter " appraiser D") by the court, and the result of the appraisal is "court appraisal".

In calculating the amount of compensation, there is an error of misunderstanding the amount of compensation, but on the other hand, the result of entrustment of the appraiser E to the appraiser E by this court (hereinafter " appraiser E by the court again," and the result of the appraisal is "court reexamination".

(2) The compensation calculated pursuant to the above falls under a reasonable amount of compensation, and thus, the Defendant should additionally pay the difference between the pertinent reasonable compensation and the compensation determined by the adjudication to the Plaintiff. 2) In particular, since the land category in the public record No. 2 is used as a forest or a site for the antenna steel tower by obtaining lawful permission for changing the form and quality, the above land is assessed as a miscellaneous land in the court reassessment.