1. As to Plaintiff A’s KRW 46,232,70, and KRW 14,500,000 for Plaintiff B and each of the said money, the Defendant from April 16, 2014 to April 2014.

1. Details, etc. of ruling;

(a) Business authorization and public notice - Housing site development project (C; hereinafter “instant project”): Defendant: D public notice of the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on March 23, 201, E public notice of the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on September 21, 201 - Project operator: Defendant

B. The Central Land Expropriation Committee’s ruling on expropriation on February 20, 2014 (hereinafter “adjudication on expropriation”) - The objects of expropriation are as indicated in the column of land in the annexed list of details of compensation.

(hereinafter “each land of this case”) - Compensation for losses: The same shall apply to the description in the column for the amount of adjudication on expropriation of the attached compensation statement.

- From the starting date of expropriation: An appraisal corporation on April 15, 2014 - An appraisal corporation and an appraisal corporation, one appraisal corporation (hereinafter collectively referred to as “appraisals for expropriation”) and one appraisal corporation (hereinafter referred to as “appraisals for expropriation”) shall mean the arithmetic mean of the results of the appraisal;

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on objection on October 23, 2014 (hereinafter “adjudication”) - Compensation for losses: The same shall apply to the statement in the column for the amount of the ruling on objection in the annexed list of details of compensation.

- An appraisal corporation: An appraisal corporation and the Korea C&T appraisal corporation (hereinafter collectively referred to as "appraisal for objection") and an appraisal corporation shall mean the arithmetic mean of the results of the appraisal (hereinafter referred to as "appraisal for objection").

D. The result of the court’s entrustment to the appraiser F of this Court for appraisal (hereinafter “court appraiser”) by the appraiser F of this Court, and the result of the appraisal is “court appraisal” - Compensation for losses: The same shall apply to the statement in the column of the court’s appraisal on the details of compensation.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 1 to 4 (including paper numbers), the result of the appraisal commission to appraiser F by this court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. Since the amount of compensation for the plaintiffs' assertion of expropriation and the amount of compensation for losses in the adjudication on expropriation of each of the lands of this case was excessively underestimated, the defendant is assessed to the plaintiff A as the difference between the reasonable amount of compensation according to the court appraisal result and the above amount of compensation for losses.