1. The Defendant’s KRW 92,337,200 as well as 5% per annum from May 9, 2013 to May 15, 2014 to the Plaintiff.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Project approval and publication - Project name: Urban planning facility project (C) - Public announcement: Defendant on January 7, 2012

(b) Adjudication on expropriation on June 11, 2012 by the Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal - Subject to expropriation: The area of land in the column for expropriation of the compensation details table in attached Form 1 shall be as stated;

(hereinafter referred to as “instant land” and, in case of referring to individual land, specified as its parcel number) - Compensation: 251,392,50 won - Commencement Date of expropriation: - An appraisal corporation on July 10, 2012 - An appraisal corporation on March 1, 2012 and two appraisal corporations;

(c) The Central Land Expropriation Committee’s ruling on March 22, 2013 - Subject matters of expropriation: The same shall apply to the land in this case and the column of objects of expropriation on the compensation list in attached Table 1.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant obstacles” - Compensation: It shall be as stated in the column for the amount of objection made in attached Form 1.

- An appraisal corporation: Each entry in Gap, Gap, Eul, and Eul's evidence (including branch numbers, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the whole purport of pleadings, as a whole, without a dispute, whether there is a ground for recognition, Gap's evidence 1, 2, and Eul's evidence 1 and 2 (including a ground number; hereinafter the same shall apply).

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The appraisal of the instant land does not reach a reasonable amount of compensation by following the selection of comparative standard sites and precedents compensation sites and the assessment of individual factors. On the other hand, the compensation calculated according to the commission of appraisal to appraiser D (hereinafter “court appraisal”) by this court constitutes a reasonable amount of compensation.

B) A group of land owned by the Plaintiff is the land in this case and J land due to the instant project (hereinafter “the remaining land in this case”).

It has been divided into two parts.