1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff, who is a national of the Republic of Egyp of Egyp (hereinafter “Egyp”) of the Republic of Egypt, entered the Republic of Korea with the status of stay B-2 (tourism) August 28, 2014.

B. On October 26, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application for recognition of refugee status with the Defendant, but on March 20, 2018, the Defendant rendered a disposition to recognize refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that it is difficult to recognize “profuges that there are sufficient grounds for fear of persecution” as stipulated in Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Convention”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees.

C. On April 17, 2018, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice against the instant disposition. However, the Minister of Justice dismissed the Plaintiff’s objection on the same ground as on September 3, 2018.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 3 and 7, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion had already filed an application for refugee status one time, and received a disposition for refugee status non-recognition from the defendant, and the administrative litigation filed against the disposition also became final and conclusive.

On the other hand, around April 25, 2014, the Plaintiff was in the vicinity of the place of demonstration held by the Kahrir in the square, and was arrested at the police for about one month, and was arrested at the police for about one month. After the Plaintiff was in the Republic of Korea, the Plaintiff continued to be in the trial due to the instant case in Egypt and was sentenced to imprisonment for six years on August 2017.

After the decision against the administrative litigation seeking the cancellation of the previous refugee non-recognition disposition, the plaintiff could not return to Egypt as it was changed.

Nevertheless, the plaintiff's application for refugee status is filed.