1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on October 4, 2010, as a foreigner with the nationality of the Republic of Nmmmal Demal Demal (hereinafter “Nmal”), with the status of stay of E-9 (Non-professional Employment) of the Republic of Korea.

B. On July 12, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application for recognition of refugee status with the Defendant, but on August 9, 2017, the Defendant rendered a disposition for recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that it is difficult to recognize “the well-founded fear that there is a risk of persecution” as stipulated in Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Convention”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”).

C. The Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant disposition on September 11, 2017, and filed an objection with the Minister of Justice, but the Minister of Justice dismissed the Plaintiff’s objection on the same ground as the Plaintiff did on March 21, 2018.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 3, Eul evidence 1 to 3, and the purport of whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff was the first spologist, and the Plaintiff was the first spologist in around 1992.

After that, the Plaintiff began to be threatened to the effect that the Plaintiff would not believe that the eths of the eths of the high village are in trust.

In addition, the plaintiff worked from four arms as a person responsible for road construction, from around 2003, the plaintiff demanded to recover violence and to pay money and exercised violence.

In the event that the plaintiff returns to four arms in his own country, it is likely to be threatened with life or physical freedom from the hyds of the high-speed village and violence.

Nevertheless, the disposition of this case which rejected the Plaintiff’s application for refugee status should be revoked as it is unlawful.

B. Article 2 Subparag. 1 of the Refugee Act is determined.