logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2019.05.09 2019구단2148
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on May 26, 2016 as a foreigner of the nationality of the Republic of Egypt (hereinafter “Egyp”) of the Republic of Egypt (hereinafter “Egypt”).

B. On June 15, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for recognition of refugee status with the Defendant, but on March 12, 2018, the Defendant rendered a disposition for recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that it is difficult to recognize “the well-founded fear of persecution” as prescribed by Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Convention”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”).

C. On April 13, 2018, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice against the instant disposition. However, the Minister of Justice dismissed the Plaintiff’s objection on the same ground as on September 14, 2018.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 3, Eul evidence 1 to 3, and the purport of whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff started to come up with the Suchimpios, which began at the end of 2014 to the early of 2015, women B, who were women B.

However, the Plaintiff’s female-friendly job offers came to be pregnant between the Plaintiff, and the father of the son and female began to pose a threat, such as threatening the Plaintiff to murder.

In addition, the reference of B is also the state of reporting to the police that the plaintiff rapeed B.

The plaintiff is now unable to return to Egypt due to these problems.

Nevertheless, the defendant's disposition of this case which did not accept the plaintiff's application for refugee status should be revoked as it is unlawful.

B. Article 2 Subparag. 1 of the Refugee Act provides that a person who is a refugee is a race, religion, nationality, and specific person.

arrow