A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 7, 2014, at around 22:05, the Defendant: (a) destroyed property; (b) removed a police officer called up for the 112-reported 112 on the street in front of Jung-gu Incheon, Jung-gu; (c) removed him from the clothes containing a mobile phone on the victim E B, who was parked next, or on the vehicle owned by the victim D; and (d) damaged the property so that the repair cost is equivalent to the repair cost that it is difficult to know that the part of the gardeds cannot be seen.

2. 공무집행방해 피고인은 제1항 기재 일시, 장소에서 제1항과 같은 이유로 D의 베르나 승용차를 손괴하고, 이에 112신고를 받고 출동한 경찰관 F이 피고인을 재물손괴죄의 현행범인으로 체포한다는 취지로 고지하자 발로 경찰관 F을 우측 허벅지 부위를 1회 걷어차 밀치는 등 폭행하고, 같은 날 22:15경 인천 중구 G에 있는 H지구대 앞 노상에서, 같은 경찰관 F에게, “이 대머리 짭새 새끼. 너 그냥 둘 줄 알아. 너 옷 벗긴다. 너 감사실, 인권위원회에 민원 제기한다. 씨팔 니들이 세금 받아먹을 자격이 있냐. 옷 벗고 집에 가라 씨팔 새끼야. 니 마누리가 이 시간에 어떤 새끼랑 뒹굴지 모른다. 씨팔놈아.”라고 수차례 욕설하고, 계속하여 지구대로 데리고 들어가던 F의 얼굴을 머리로 1회가량 들이받는 등 폭행하여 경찰관의 112신고 처리업무 등에 관한 정당한 공무집행을 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each police statement made to F and D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on damaged photographs;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for the crime;

1. Grounds for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes;

1. The scope of the sentencing guidelines for recommendations [the scope of recommendations] is set forth in the category 1 of the obstruction of performance of official duties (the obstruction of performance of official duties/performance of official duties) from 6 months to 1 year.