logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.08.10 2015고단2104
모욕등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 6, 2014, at around 20:30, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol in a private taxi operated by the victim B (the age of 65) in the Seoul Station. While the said victim stopped the taxi and operated the dial construction near the North Asia-dong, which is the destination at which the Defendant requested, the Defendant was taking a bath, such as “cat, to be assigned, to be assigned,” and the victim was called the C District D Public Security Center using the vehicle.

1. At around 20:35 on December 6, 2014, the Defendant’s insultd the victim B by openly insulting the victim Nonparty B, including, in the course of the D Public Security Center located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant ran the cab at a taxi, and b, compared with the driver’s photograph attached before the string of the vehicle, she was in comparison with the cab, she was in line with the 112 report (NO. 10165) and sent to the Defendant, she was in line with the driver’s photograph attached before the string of the vehicle, and was in line with the 112 report (NO. 10165).

2. The Defendant obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) stated in paragraph (1), at the time and place specified in paragraph (1); (b) stated that “the Defendant: (c) was a slope F (43) affiliated with the Seodaemun Police Station C District forces of the Seodaemun Police Station, sent out after receiving a report as stipulated in paragraph (1); and (d) stated that “the Defendant, after paying the taxi inconvenience, reported the taxi operation information on the receipt; and (c) reported the taxi operation information to the Seoul Metropolitan City Multicol Center; and (d) the Defendant, while demanding the Defendant to pay a fee, was a taxi engineer B (the victim of Paragraph (1) who was seated in the front seat of the driver’s seat; and (e) stated that the said police officer would recover the amount the Defendant experienced and pay the taxi cost properly; and (e) the Defendant, who caused the Defendant’s assaulting the F police officer’s right end part of the police officer with his body and intentionally assault the police officer on official duties related to the report once.

arrow