logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.09.19 2016고정276
업무방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and B are friendly.

1. On November 24, 2013, the Defendant and B reached a “E” restaurant operated by the victim D (n, 44 years of age) of the victim D (n, 8 years of age) in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do on November 24, 2013, the Defendant and B ordered alcohol and food without drinking and ordered the victim to “breadly drink so that they can do so.”

” 라는 말을 듣자, B은 “ 술 먼저 갖다주면 될 거 아이가, 씹할, 되게 깐깐하네,

In this context, I would like to take a bath in the large sound that I would be able to drink, and the defendant expressed in the above restaurant entrance that "I would am the victim's shoulder while I would like to read "I would am Chewing, I would like to am the same year, I would like to say I would like to am the victim's shoulder."

In this respect, the defendant and B conspiredd about 20 minutes and interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

2. The Defendant and B, as an act of interference with the duties set forth in the preceding paragraph, expressed a favorable appraisal to the victim on the date on which the said victim reported to 112 and was dispatched by the police. On November 24, 2013, the Defendant sought again at the restaurants set forth in the preceding port on November 24, 2013, the Defendant opened a restaurant entrance, sealed the face into the restaurant, sealed the gate into the gate, and took another look at, “I have reported, there is no crime, and there is no other crime, and until I have taken off, I have attempted to write down, I have saw, I have shot, and sick down until I have taken off,” and even B interfered with the victim’s restaurant business operation by force by force with the Defendant and the desire as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect of each police officer against the defendant or B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 314 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow