Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
【The Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor or two years of suspension of execution due to a violation of road traffic law at the Changwon District Court’s Changwon Branch on January 5, 201, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 13th of the same month. On December 7, 2011, the period of suspension of execution was one year after having been sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor due to a violation of business affairs in the Changwon District Court’s Changwon District Court’s Changwon District Court’s Changwon Branch’s order on February 24, 2012, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 17, 2013, and the execution of each of the above imprisonment with prison labor was terminated.
【2015 order 317】
1. Obstruction of business;
A. On September 5, 2015, the Defendant: (a) 11:25, around 2015, the Defendant: (b) 10 minutes of the disturbance 30 minutes, such as breading and breading the victim D with a view to drinking in a market run by Gohap-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun; and (c) 30 minutes of the disturbance breadbbing at the catum house; and (d) prevented the Defendant from entering the cating with customers who want to enter the catum house.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.
B. Around 17:00 on April 14, 2015, the Defendant: (a) 17:00, the victim E, who was in Gohap-gun C, was seated in the front table of the F cafeteria operated by the victim; and (b) the victim expressed the victim’s desire to “breathing.” on the ground that the victim does not drink; (c) the victim made the 45 minutes of the disturbance, i.e., taking the 45 minutes of the disturbance, and made the 5-6 customers in the restaurant at the cafeteria, and prevented the Defendant from going to enter the restaurant.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.
2. The Defendant shall take out his sexual organ behind a female guest who intends to enter a market house at the time, time, and place of paragraph 1 of this Article;
In other words, the said female was openly engaged in obscene acts, such as going against the above female, and seeing urine on the front floor of the market.
[2016 Highest 49] The Defendant, on January 2, 2015, is under the influence of alcohol for the victim, who is a restaurant operator at the I cafeteria operated by the victim H in Gohap-gun G around 07:32, 2015.