A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the operation of X-ray motor vehicles.

On May 6, 2017, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol content of 0.148% during blood transfusion around 19:35 on May 6, 2017, the Defendant driven the said vehicle at the speed of 170-1 MG Saemaul Undong-gu, Daejeon, and driven the said vehicle at the speed of about 40 kilometers per hour at the speed of about 170-1 MG Saemaul Undong-gu.

At this point, the crosswalk where signal lights are installed is adjacent to the intersection, and there is a large and congested vehicle traffic, such as neighboring electric railroad stations and universities, etc., so a person engaged in driving motor vehicles has a duty of care to ensure safe operation by avoiding confluences with the front vehicle by thoroughly operating the electric clock and operating the brake and steering gear accurately.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of the Defendant’s negligence while neglecting his duties while driving, the Defendant received the back portion of the DPoter’s Dpoter’s Dpoter’s Dpoter’s Dpoter’s D motor vehicle in front of the Defendant’s running direction as the front portion of the Defendant’s XG motor vehicle, and received in sequence the back portion of the victim’s E( South, 61 years old)’s driving in front of the said Dpoter’s freight in front of the said Dpoter’s driving.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the injury to the victim C, such as salt, tensions, etc. in front of the race of the light that requires approximately three weeks’ medical treatment, the injury to the victim E, the injury to the diversous base of the diversous base of the diversous base of the diverset of the diverset of the diverset of the diverset of the diverset of the diverset of the diverset of the diverset of the diverset of the diverset of the diverset of the diverset of the diverset

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the report on detection of the primary driver;

1. Application of each statute to each written diagnosis;

1. Article 148-2 (2) 2 of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting a crime;