1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

The defendant's dismissal on September 25, 2013 against the plaintiff.

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

A. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning the instant case is next to the judgment of the first instance.

It is identical to the judgment of the first instance court, except for the modification as stated in the following Paragraph 2, and the decision in the trial is added, and it is also accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. Part 1) The amendment of the first instance court’s 3th 20th e.g., “the same” includes any number except where the number is indicated particularly in the following. 2) The first instance court’s 8th e.g., “stock company” through “the same 3th e.g., from the “stock company” under the first e.g., the same part.

T, a representative of R in this regard, stated that the Plaintiff paid KRW 2 million to the Plaintiff at the time of the relocation of the office, etc. on the ground that the Plaintiff was required to purchase the goods at the time of the relocation of the office. T, a subsequent fact that the said money was not returned and the said money was not used at the expense of the purchase of the goods at the time of the relocation of the office, etc. 3), followed up to the “T,” of the first instance judgment No. 8, No. 11, No. 12, and No. 14, “T,” of the first instance judgment No. 8, No. 11, No. 28, and No. 110, and No. 110, and that the Defendant’s testimony at the time of the transfer of the office, as stated in the first instance judgment No. 1, No. 28, and No. 31, and No. 4, the Defendant’s testimony at the time of the first instance judgment and the first instance judgment No. 400,” as a witness’s testimony at the first instance judgment. 1.

The 5th trial accepted the defendant's defenses of interim income deduction, and the 18th judgment of the court of first instance is set forth.